2025 Harry and Cecile Starr Prize Winning Theses

This year, the Center for Jewish Studies awarded four students with the Harry and Cecile Starr Prize in Jewish Studies. The Prize is by faculty member nomination only, for an outstanding senior thesis or Ph.D. dissertation in Jewish and Hebrew studies by a Harvard student.

Best Doctoral dissertation in the field of Jewish and Hebrew Studies:

Photo of Uri Schreter
photo credit: Daryl Marshke

Uri Schreter, Ph.D., ’25

Completed his degree in the Department of Music
Nominated by Professor Kay Kaufman Shelemay

The Jewish Beat: Klezmer, Culture, and
Community in Postwar America”

Abstract:
This dissertation recovers the history of American Jewish wedding music during the early postwar period (1945–1965), illuminating the interplay between musical genres, social practices, and Jewish identity. In the wake of World War II and the founding of the State of Israel in 1948, most American Jews drifted away from Yiddish language and culture.

Scholarly accounts of this period have often described klezmer, the traditional instrumental folk music of Yiddish-speaking Jews, as virtually absent until the 1970s. This study argues, however, that klezmer not only endured but provided the foundation for postwar American Jewish dance music: although its traditional repertoire receded, its style merged with Israeli and American popular genres, giving rise to a new hybrid form—the “klezmerized” Israeli folk song—that remained widely performed and deeply meaningful for postwar American Jews. This analysis reframes the relationship between Yiddish and Hebrew popular music, reading against their presumed opposition to reveal an ongoing dialectical exchange that persists to this day. The study further demonstrates the crucial role of music in sustaining diaspora identities and communities, showing that Jewish dance music remained central to postwar weddings across social, cultural, and demographic lines, even as other rituals faded. Drawing on archival materials, sound recordings, and more than eighty oral history interviews with postwar wedding musicians and couples, it challenges prevailing narratives about Jewish music in this era, exposing how political ideologies shape perceptions of music and how music, in turn, constructs collective memory.

Best dissertations in the field of Jewish and Hebrew Studies prepared by an undergraduate:

Sage Lattman photo

Sage Segal Lattman, ’25

Senior, Winthrop House
Concentration: History; Secondary Field: Computer Science
Nominated by Professor Derek Penslar

“Descent and Dissent: Interfaith Marriage and Reform Judaism’s 1983 Resolution of Patrilineal Descent”

Abstract:
This thesis explores the Reform movement’s 1983 Resolution on Patrilineal Descent, situating it within the social trends and institutional politics of the Jewish community during that period.

It seeks to answer how interfaith marriage evolved from a personal decision made by some Jews into a matter of concern for Jewish institutions. By combining aspects of religious, institutional, and social history, this thesis seeks to provide a fuller understanding of the Resolution on Patrilineal Descent and what it meant for — and revealed about — American Jewry. The patrilineal decision was both a turning point for American Jews and emblematic of longstanding tensions within the community. By accepting patrilineal descent, the Reform movement broke ranks with American Jewish institutions’ practice of blanket opposition to intermarriage. In doing so, they inflamed existing tensions between the different denominations that had long disagreed on how Jews should balance the tension between pursuing their individual desires and remaining connected to the Jewish community.

Senior, Pforzheimer House
Concentration: Social Studies; Secondary Field: Mind, Brain & Behavior, and a Language Citation in Modern Standard Arabic (NELC)
Nominated by Professor Melani Cammett

“Homeland or Hindsight? Young Jewish Americans and the Israel Question”

Photo of Charlotte Ritz-Jack
Abstract:
This project attempts to explain the increasingly diverse attitudes young American Jews hold towards Israel. Despite often being raised in similar circumstances, Jews under the age of 29 are both leading Palestinian solidarity movements and ferociously critiquing them.

To better understand the roots of this cleavage, I conducted 22 interviews of young American Jews throughout the summer and fall of 2024, archival research of 1990s and 2000s Israel education of prominent Jewish institutions, and ran a small survey of the Harvard Jewish undergraduate body. Throughout the thesis, I argue American Jews under 29 were raised under the “Zionist Consensus,” whereby Jewish identity was synonymous with strong support of Israel. Despite this influence, current events and acculturation have made young Jews understand their Jewish identity as a fluid, personalized balance between old family histories, Israel, and life in America, thereby weakening the Zionist Consensus. I then argue that this personal balance determines whether young Jews respond to criticisms of Israel in one of two ways: clinging to their childhood narratives or abandoning them.

Photo of Meredith Zielonka

Meredith W. B. Zielonka, ’25

Senior, Mather House
Joint Concentration: Government and Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
Nominated by Professor Melani Cammett

“Fractured but Fortified: Harnessing Ideological and Ethnic Division for Resilient Peacebuilding in Israel/Palestine”

Abstract:
How can peacebuilding organizations prepare themselves for crises that directly threaten their missions? In this thesis, I propose a new lens to help peacebuilding organizations build resilience by considering how the circumstances of ethnic conflict can change the usual assumptions of organization theory, adapting current research to the particular needs of the peacebuilding field.

I explore these elements through a mixed-methods analysis. First, I field a survey of employees of peacebuilding organizations, quantitatively evaluating the relationship between resilience and its potential predictors. Second, I conduct a series of interviews for comparative case studies, comparing pathways to resilience to probe the mechanisms leading to these outcomes. I find that two factors have significant positive relationships with resilience, which are underemphasized or overlooked in existing research. I propose that “inclusive governance,” or leadership that supports staff both emotionally and through material investment, and “open staff recruitment,” or recruitment with few ideological barriers for new staff, both lead to higher levels of resilience.
My findings guide peacebuilding leaders in specific practices to reinforce internal resilience among staff and encourage them to think creatively to strengthen their organizations in increasingly volatile times for their work.